AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() ![]() Rotten Tomatoes rating: 88 percent 'The Conjuring' (2013) Later, they realize that evil may be closer to them than they initially thought. Joe Edgerton, Christopher Abbott and Riley Keough star in this apocalyptic film sees that two families fight for survival. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 87 percent 'It Comes at Night' (2017) The second in the Fear Street trilogy tells the story of a gruesome struggle for survival as a killer terrorizes the cursed town of Shadyside. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 88 percent 'Fear Street Part Two: 1978' (2021) Rotten Tomatoes rating: 88 percent '#Alive' (2020)Ī video-game streamer in Seoul, South Korea, struggles to survive a zombie apocalypse. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 88 percent 'The Ravenous' (2017)Ī small Canadian village is brought down by a flesh-eating plague, which transforms residents' into zombies and turns them against their loved ones. A mysterious stranger shows her what is really happening in the outside world, and she realizes she is in grave danger. Seven-year-old Chloe is kept locked inside her house by her father Hy, who keeps guns and large sums of cash. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 89 percent 'Freaks' (2018) This zombie thriller stars Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Bill Murray and Amber Heard. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 89 percent 'Zombieland' (2009) ![]() Rotten Tomatoes rating: 90 percent 'Fear Street Part Three: 1666' (2021)Īfter a witch hunt in a colonial town in 1666 sees a curse put on a neighborhood, teenagers in 1994 try to put an end to it. Not to be confused with the 2004 horror film of the same name, this is a psychological horror film where protagonist Aaron answers an online ad and drives to a stranger's house to film him-to find that he has many bizarre requests. ![]() The Hollywood Movie Stars That Are Set To Become the Next Biopics.'Hocus Pocus 2' Trailer Stirs Up Nostalgic Frenzy: 'We're Back, Witches'.Is 'Orphan: First Kill' Based on a True Story?.You, and I mean you! The person reading this at 4 in the morning surrounded by pizza boxes. The only possible good thing I can think of is that the camera man decided to take the lens cap of the camera, turned the camera on and pointed in in the face of the actors My advice, skip this one and warn others to stay away from this. Hell, even the custom design was basically just whatever the filmmakers could find at Party City. The editing has all the excitement of an office cubical. The production design had less effect put into it than an essay written by a high schooler about The Scarlett Letter. The writing is Hocus Pocus without the silliness and the charm. The cinematography is so bland that I hesitate to call it cinematography. The acting is so wooden that it literal feels like watching to trees talking to each other. I cannot think of a single thing that is even remotely passible about this movie. However, even though some things happen in this movie, nothing happens. I've seen the worst of Disney Channel, Nickelodeon, Hallmark and Lifetime original movies and something happens in them that can at least gets an ironic laugh out of me. This movie isn't worth turning spoilers on, because I'm one hundred percent certain that no cares about this movie (seeing that there are only two reviews for this movie and the both hate it). A turtle would say that this movie needs to pick up the pace. To say that this movie is slow is the equivalent of saying that water is wet. This movie's pace is the equivalent of walking through a room that is filled to the brim with honey. I don't have a clever intro to this review, so I'm just going to cut to the chase. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |